Which Knives Make The Cut? My Review Process

I get a lot of questions from readers about my knife review methodology, how I pick the knives I review and why I won’t review x, y, and z. Elise has responded to a number of these questions in our FAQ, but there were plenty more asked that needed to be answered, so I figured I would break it all down today so whenever someone asks, I can just link them this article.

I think some of my readers imagine I just buy a knife one day and review it the next but in practice it’s a smidgen more complicated than that.

When I started MTJS with Elise, life was much simpler. I already owned 100+ knives, the bulk of which were Spydercos and I just reviewed what I already had. With the bulk of my collection reviewed, I started buying knives that you wanted me to cover like various Cold Steels and Benchmades. The reality is that I don’t often get excited about new knives. This isn’t because I have super specific tastes or because cool new knives don’t exist, but rather because in one shape or form (after having accumulated hundreds of knives), I already own it.

edc-folding-knife-review-scandi-grind-cold-steel-finn-wolfCold Steel Finn Wolf Scandi EDC Pocket Knife – Amazon / Blade HQ

This is the reality. I review knives for you guys. When it comes to blades – I own at least one (more like five) of everything. I have every size, material, lock type, crap steel, supersteel, traditional styling, uber modern styling, etc. knife. Sure, new models come out every year, but the fact of the matter is, I already own something similar to it somewhere in my closet.

I review new knives because my readers don’t have my collection and I believe my reviews honestly reflect what I have in my hands. Consequently, I approach every knife review with a relatively open mind.

The one thing that I really love and value about cranking out so much content on this blog is the response from you, my readers. I have a super engaged readership (even if you don’t always agree with me) and I like to think I do my best to respond to all questions (and criticisms). In the past 4 years as of today I have responded to thousands of comments personally. That’s a lot of opinions, but it puts me in an odd situation because I often discuss knives with people with maybe a few dozen in their collection. Contrast this with my collection, where I’ve have broken the 600 mark, easily. I get a lot of flack for speaking assertively about performance, especially when it goes against popular narrative, but the thing is folks, I have a literal closet full of hardware (two if you count the fact that half my knives are still in Canada) so when someone says, “No, an x-brand knife can’t cut as well as a y-brand knife,” it’s almost surreal because I can quite literally walk a few feet and test out this theory with dozens of models from x and y.

This weird position as someone who both loves knives and yet has more steel than he needs has made me frankly ambivalent towards most new releases, and has changed my purchasing habits.

So, now that you understand my position on the matter (or at least I hope you do!), let’s talk about the knives I buy, the knives I review, and those I ignore (after all, I have to ignore something!).

ontario-rat-1-review-more-than-just-surviving-jeff-randall-design-edc-knifeOntario Rat-1 Jeff Randall Design Folding EDC Knife – Amazon / Blade HQ

Choosing the Knife

When choosing to buy a knife to review, the biggest consideration I make is if a reader requests it. Every time I get a comment about a specific model, I add it to a spreadsheet (or with some that get asked over and over, I just make a mental note that I really need to snap that one up). If a knife gets enough “support,” on my community or in the forums, I will no doubt do my absolute best to snap it up even if I have my own reservations. This was the case for the Schrade SCH304 review – I kept seeing them pop up everywhere and you guys kept asking me to review some of these inexpensive Schrades, and hell, you broke me. Interestingly, the biggest impact on my knife tastes has been you folks. Before MTJS, I never bought a single Cold Steel because I always thought they were mall ninja fads (I am happy to say, I was wrong) and if nothing else, I learn from my prejudices. I started off this knife journey as a Spyderco fanatic almost exclusively and now because of you, I have sampled, owned, and reviewed something from pretty much all large manufacturers.

No regrets. I was wrong to be dismissive of Cold Steel – super tough, well made knives at an industry leading price point and I shouldn’t have ignored them for so many years.

So, recommendations from you all is the biggest motivator. As I’ve hinted at about seeing a knife appear a lot in the forums, I also look at general popularity. Every once in a while, digging for something new, I’ll browse Blade HQ and sort by most popular, latest, and of course, check out what’s on sale; some of the knives look good, others don’t but if they are super popular, I figure I will give them a shot.

Another example would be the Ontario RAT-1. Always had reservations about the styling, but its popularity made me make the jump and I bought it. Spoiler alert, once again I was wrong – it’s a great knife.

Why no customs or rare knives?

I very rarely review custom knives. I think I’ve only done the L.T. Wright Genesis on here, though correct me if you think of another I’ve done. Why?

First of all, because they are prohibitively expensive and I just don’t have the budget. Secondly, availability is questionable and if I review something, I want you to be able to get your hands on one if you want to.

This is the reason why I own quite a few rare knives, but I haven’t, nor will I ever review them. For example the Spyderco Dodo is one of my favourite knives (I’ve even listed it in my Top American Knives & Top Spydercos posts) but it’s no longer in production so no review. I also own a cool titanium and G-10 friction folder by Quartermaster made exclusively for the UK market. It has a badass Union Jack anodized into the titanium scales and a bunch of nifty lil’ quirks, but even though I own and love it, I shan’t review it because you won’t be able to get one (limited run of 300).

Another example are knives from the late 90’s and early 2000’s that I own like a cool bowie by Muela from Spain. It’s just disrespectful (in my opinion) to be like – “This is a great knife, amazing fit and finish, etc. etc. .. Oh, and you can’t have one 🙂 “.

I also own some quirky knives like this weird bone handled double carbon steel blade friction folder that just doesn’t generate any interest and thus, whilst I own and sporadically carry it, it’s unlikely to be reviewed.

What about knives from this new company?

Alright, so let me be clear on this because this gets asked a lot. At this point in my life I have handled literally thousands of knives from hundreds of manufacturers. I point blank refuse to work with some of them (call it a boycott if you will) for ethical reasons or because they have in the past made knives that are just too much like someone else’s design. For that reason you will never seen an SRM, Ganzo, etc. knife review on my blog. They have knives that were outright plagiarized or were heavily “inspired” by the original model from legit Western companies to the point that I cannot in good conscience give them a platform. It would in essence be legitimizing theft.

As for all the new manufacturers out of China, they are just too new. I know nothing of them, the people behind the factory, or their longevity in this industry and as such I am still watching to see how this will unfold.

muela-mouflon-fixed-blade-knifeMuela Mouflon 18 Fixed Blade Knife – Amazon / eBay

Reviewing the Knife

So I pick the knife, buy it, and now I have the blade in my hands and you probably think I review it almost instantly right? Well, no.

I generally keep a knife in my review draw for 3 months to 2 years (sometimes even longer) before I review it. Shortest has probably been a month or so. When you see the pretty photographs in my knife reviews, they are taken by Elise, the majority of times before they are tested, so they often look as they would in the store. The reason I do this: I have broken knives in the past and making a review with only photographs of a broken blade is just silly. Also, I’m not re-buying it just for pictures if it breaks. If it breaks, I mention it and the photographs of the breakage, but I want some “intact, untarnished” photographs for reference.

Another reason I do this is because I love my wife. High quality photography is a lot of work and it’s even more work if you do one knife at a time every once in a blue moon. So we take the “stock” photos in batches. We do it this way to spare her sanity, because frankly she would go crazy otherwise and I don’t think I’d find someone else to put up with me to this extent. I know what you are thinking, “Thomas.. have you forgotten that she likes the Spyderco Pingo?”

I know, I know, folks – I never said she was perfect, but she’s pretty damn close.

Why no rating?

We follow a review format here at MTJS, because after God-only-knows how many reviews, we need some consistency. With that said, we do not use a star or x/5 rating as the knife world is always evolving and so are materials. Consequently, if the review had a set benchmark in 2012, it would be meaningless today in 2017. That’s just life and manufacturing improvements. And it’s a good thing.

Back when I started on my knife journey as a kid, it was easy to find a crappy knife. These days? Very difficult. 99% of knives on the market from a reputable vendor will perform decently. Maybe there will be some fit and finish issues or iffy ergonomics, but when it comes to steel quality and lock up, most knives are relatively solid compared to the crap I owned in the 90’s.

Think about this folks: Randall chose 440B as a blade steel for their stainless, heavy duty combat blades. Now, it would be laughable to use such a steel when we have CPM-S35VN or any other modern stainless powdered steels. This is the reality of the knife world, it’s always changing so a knife that will be 4/5 stars today, may only be worth 1/5 stars tomorrow. A good example are the Chinese made knives – they used to be utter garbage, the steel was glorified pot metal, but now, the quality is honestly mind blowing for the price. Pick up a G-10 CRKT Drifter or a Spyderco Tenacious and tell me it’s a badly made knife!


Why Not Just Review More Knives?

The reality is that at most, I crank out 1 review a week, and even then, one a week is pushing it. The reason why is because I own and use every single knife I review. It’s just not possible for me to give an honest review if I only handle the knife for a few days and just put it back in its box.

To illustrate this point, here is a small sample of knives I currently own and plan to review, but have yet to get round to. Just to give you some perspective.

  • SOG NorthWest Ranger: Decent knife that I made much better by grinding the guard off. Very lean with a very nice handle. Will most likely be ready for review at some point next year.
  • Cold Steel SRK: Also a very cool knife, highly unlikely to be reviewed before next year.
  • Becker BK2: Absolute monster, no ETA on review
  • Cold Steel Finn Bear: Unreal value as usual from Cold Steel – expect this one to be reviewed this year.
  • Tops Lite Trekker: Not 100% sure if I will review it, but it’s likely because I have yet to review a Tops knife and I feel bad.
  • SOG Seal Pup: Still on the fence about this one.
  • Spyderco Bill Moran Upswept: I have owned this mean slicer for nearly a decade. Still haven’t gotten round to reviewing it even though I actually EDC’d it for nearly 6 months in 2011.
  • Schrade SCHF9: Bang for buck, probably the best heavy duty beater available.
  • Boker Gnome: I have the limited edition carbon fibre model. Very neat, but in my opinion after owning it for over a year – not very practical for daily use.
  • Spyderco Reverse: Unbelievable blade in terms of potential for carnage. It oozes bad intent and will 100% be reviewed.. eventually, once I figure out a suitable review format.
  • Boker Rhino (stag): A knife Elise actually picked out for herself. I EDC’d this knife back in 2013. Great quality and above average ergonomics. No idea why I haven’t review it yet.
  • Spyderco Stretch 2: It’s so messed up that I still haven’t reviewed this one. For the span of about a year, I could’ve sworn I did, but nope, no review up. I own the Sprint Run Super Blue edition and it’s freaking amazing.
  • Boker War Toad: Another quirky knife Elise picked out for herself. Just plain weird, definitely gonna get a review, just don’t know when.


Also some of my favourite knives that I bought, but for whatever reason will not be reviewed (again, a very small sample of my total collection).

  • CRKT Hisshou: Very cool blade. It cost a stupid amount of money for a “knife” (more like a small sword) that objectively, I will never use. I keep considering how to review it, but frankly, I wouldn’t even know where to begin.
  • Buck 406: I love this knife but sadly, I shan’t be reviewing it because availability is scarce. If you can get your hands on one, do so.
  • Spyderco Spot: Weird neck knife, been discontinued for years. I bought it when Spydies were still sold in grey boxes.
  • Spyderco Dodo: Bought the blaze orange G-10 version when it came out. It’s been in a few of my pocket dumps, but due to its rarity, I shan’t be reviewing it.

Anyway, just scribbled out this list so you can understand the sheer number of knives I have in the pipework. The messed up thing is – due to how many knives are released each year – I almost consistently buy more knives than I can feasibly review  year after year. I currently own around 100+ knives that I am/was planning on reviewing (that’s like 2 years worth of reviews!), but time constraints mean they get lost in a drawer. Sometimes a knife gets released and y’all clamour for me to review it, so I buy it and it gets bumped up the list. That’s how a great knife like the Cold Steel SRK can be in my possession for so many years, and still not be published as a review.

quartermaster-barney-mcgrew-flagged-folding-knifeQuartermaster Barney McGrew Flagged Folding Knife

Crazy, I know. But that’s what its like for me, as someone who writes reviews from experience instead of just writing up the marketing brochure and calling myself an expert. Gotta make decisions about what gets shown and what doesn’t because at the end of the day I only have time to review at most 52 knives a year (and I have never once touched that number).

So that’s where we stand here at MTJS with regards to the knife situation. I hope this has answered questions that some of you have had and if you want to know anything else, just chime in down below as always!

Source link

First-Aid in Emergency Situations – Survivopedia
Is the US Economy Going Down?
What Are the Most and Least Dangerous U.S. States in a SHTF Scenario?
Medicine for Survival – Survivopedia
Some Prepper Survival Bushcraft Hacks and Tips 2018
Spam vs the Alternative – SHTF Prepper Tips
PREPPER’S PANTRY EMERGENCY STORE TIPS for FRUGAL LIVING #ukpreppers #costofliving Saving Cash Money
Prepper Food Storage Tips – (8 Brilliant) Food Storage – Wise Emergency Foods
Extreme Inflation happening/ Prepper Pantry $20 budget haul/Cheap food storage ideas/Keep Prepping
Stock Up On Eggs Now
The Most Frugal Foods You Can Buy Now For Your Prepper Pantry ~ Prepping When You Are Broke!
Meat Section | Food Shortages | Empty Shelves | Prepping 2022 | Prepper Pantry | Preparedness
Tips on When and How to Use Self-Defense
Top 10 Best 9mm Ammo for Self Defense
Prepper Terminology Survival Terms Acronyms- Letters “J, K, L, M, N and O”
How To Ensure Your Food Forest Feeds You Fast (And Becomes Your Backyard Emergency Food Supply)
I Dug Up Entire ANCIENT CITY In Minecraft Survival 😱
Mini Prepper Garden Spring 21
Ark Survival | Decorating 101 | Lesson #3 Plants and Crop Plots